Anonymous user
Talk:Books: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Revision: unkeen on reviews
No edit summary |
(→Revision: unkeen on reviews) |
||
Line 17:
Is everyone okay with me completely rewriting this article which is, apparently, no longer maintained? For many of the books here there are many editions, there are no reviews---only the publisher's descriptions, there are no links for errata and/or supplementary material, there is no categorization, etc. I was working on a big revision for [http://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6989&p=174472#p174472 this forum post] when I figured this stuff would make much more sense here. I will obviously also add a link to the forum topic, in case anyone is interested. --[[User:Love4boobies|Love4boobies]] 05:19, 28 May 2012 (CDT)
: I'm a little bit uneasy with us including reviews of the books here. I have several of these books and reasonably strong opinions about them but am reluctant to post them here because IMHO we are not a review site and a wiki is not an appropriate place for such things, given that anyone can change any review they don't agree with. Something like the reviews section of Amazon is probably the better place for such personal opinions as it allows aggregation of scores and allows the community to up and down rate other reviews as they see fit. Other than that I am all for people substantially revising old and unmaintained material. [[User:Jnc100|John]] 06:29, 28 May 2012 (CDT)
| |||