User talk:Lionel/What kind of kernel should I make?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
→Reply:Solar: new section |
→Making it a normal page.: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Solar, I completely agree. |
Solar, I completely agree. |
||
== Making it a normal page. == |
|||
Should I make this a normal page? |
Revision as of 06:12, 26 June 2012
I have a problem with the notion of "monolithic == unstable". For one, stability relies very much on the quality of code. The monolithic architecture is statistically more prone to kernel crashes than a microkernel if both have the same code quality. Two, while a microkernel might not experience kernel crashes as often, it takes quite some skill to have your system recover from, say, a crash of the filesystem server. If your system is rendered inoperable, it doesn't matter much if it was the kernel or a user-space process to blame... Hence, and to avoid rants like this very one, I would attempt to tender my statements a bit, not taking sides. -- Solar 04:14, 25 June 2012 (CDT)
Reply:Solar
Solar, I completely agree.
Making it a normal page.
Should I make this a normal page?