Talk:TCC: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Solar in topic Should we keep this?
Content deleted Content added
m Talk:Fasm-TCC BareBones moved to Talk:TCC |
How is this a FASM/TCC barebones article? |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== How is this a FASM/TCC barebones article? == |
|||
[[Fasm-TCC BareBones]] redirects here, but the reader is just presented with a description of TCC. I was expecting to find something similar to [[Bare Bones]] but oriented to FASM and TCC. --[[User:Messiahandrw|MessiahAndrw]] 21:45, 15 January 2012 (CST) |
|||
== Should we keep this? == |
== Should we keep this? == |
||
Revision as of 03:45, 16 January 2012
How is this a FASM/TCC barebones article?
Fasm-TCC BareBones redirects here, but the reader is just presented with a description of TCC. I was expecting to find something similar to Bare Bones but oriented to FASM and TCC. --MessiahAndrw 21:45, 15 January 2012 (CST)
Should we keep this?
This page was created in August 2009 by user Tommy, and never edited again. Right now I don't see how it adds much of value over Bare Bones. I'd rather have the FASM listing integrated in Bare Bones, and the information on TCC on a seperate page (possibly with a cross-compiler / porting tutorial, if it is so easy on dependencies?). Any opinions? -- Solar 14:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)