Talk:Sparc Barebones: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Solar
Content deleted Content added
New page: I think the original author mistook the ';' to be the line comment character for the SPARC (which it isn't, '!' is). Unless the SPARC opcode syntax is ''requiring'' the semicolon to be the... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the original author mistook the ';' to be the line comment character for the SPARC (which it isn't, '!' is). Unless the SPARC opcode syntax is ''requiring'' the semicolon to be there, I'd say delete it for added clarity. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 07:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
I think the original author mistook the ';' to be the line comment character for the SPARC (which it isn't, '!' is). Unless the SPARC opcode syntax is ''requiring'' the semicolon to be there, I'd say delete it for added clarity. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 07:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
That was the case.. I realized this after your suggestion and checking the TKisem lab manual -cb88 |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:52, 25 October 2011
I think the original author mistook the ';' to be the line comment character for the SPARC (which it isn't, '!' is). Unless the SPARC opcode syntax is requiring the semicolon to be there, I'd say delete it for added clarity. -- Solar 07:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
That was the case.. I realized this after your suggestion and checking the TKisem lab manual -cb88