Talk:Printing To Screen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
(→The fine line of "example" code: new section) |
(→The fine line of "example" code: Explained) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I don't think that we should fill our Wiki with "building block" code, especially not something so trivial as putc() / puts(). ''Everybody'' meeting [[Required Knowledge]] should be able to write this in less than five minutes. Moreover, '''if''' we provide example code, it should be a ''shining'' example - and using <tt>UCHAR</tt> and a <tt>Puts()</tt> (sp!) that doesn't do a line feed isn't. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 07:44, 22 February 2012 (CST) |
I don't think that we should fill our Wiki with "building block" code, especially not something so trivial as putc() / puts(). ''Everybody'' meeting [[Required Knowledge]] should be able to write this in less than five minutes. Moreover, '''if''' we provide example code, it should be a ''shining'' example - and using <tt>UCHAR</tt> and a <tt>Puts()</tt> (sp!) that doesn't do a line feed isn't. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 07:44, 22 February 2012 (CST) |
||
Sorry, but I was cut off before I had completed writing the code |
|||
Revision as of 18:27, 22 February 2012
Anyone object to moving this out of PFR? I'm not quite sure about the Troubleshooting section... --Alboin
The fine line of "example" code
I don't think that we should fill our Wiki with "building block" code, especially not something so trivial as putc() / puts(). Everybody meeting Required Knowledge should be able to write this in less than five minutes. Moreover, if we provide example code, it should be a shining example - and using UCHAR and a Puts() (sp!) that doesn't do a line feed isn't. -- Solar 07:44, 22 February 2012 (CST)
Sorry, but I was cut off before I had completed writing the code