Talk:Porting Newlib: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Really? 'Neutral'? For something to be neutral, I was under the impression that there had to be a disagreement about it. How, by any meaning of the word, is using 'Genesis' not appropriate as a synonym for 'Beginning'? Moreover, in [[DMA]], using Genesis makes the article a little more together due to it's style. I should say it's perfectly acceptable. Such edits seem to cause quite the opposite of the intent. --Alboin |
Really? 'Neutral'? For something to be neutral, I was under the impression that there had to be a disagreement about it. How, by any meaning of the word, is using 'Genesis' not appropriate as a synonym for 'Beginning'? Moreover, in [[DMA]], using Genesis makes the article a little more together due to it's style. I should say it's perfectly acceptable. Such edits seem to cause quite the opposite of the intent. --Alboin |
||
How is using a religious terminology at all related to what we do on this site? I made sure that my choice of words were clear and descriptive. "Genesis" might not be very clear to non-English speaking Wiki browsers. Change it back if you disagree. --[[User:Brynet-Inc|Brynet-Inc]] 18:15, 16 September 2007 (CDT) |
How is using a religious terminology at all related to what we do on this site? I made sure that my choice of words were clear and descriptive. "Genesis" might not be very clear to non-English speaking Wiki browsers. Change it back if you disagree. I personally think the [[DMA]] article and any others should not contain such "speculative" information, Audits anyone? ;-) --[[User:Brynet-Inc|Brynet-Inc]] 18:15, 16 September 2007 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 23:22, 16 September 2007
Neutral
Really? 'Neutral'? For something to be neutral, I was under the impression that there had to be a disagreement about it. How, by any meaning of the word, is using 'Genesis' not appropriate as a synonym for 'Beginning'? Moreover, in DMA, using Genesis makes the article a little more together due to it's style. I should say it's perfectly acceptable. Such edits seem to cause quite the opposite of the intent. --Alboin
How is using a religious terminology at all related to what we do on this site? I made sure that my choice of words were clear and descriptive. "Genesis" might not be very clear to non-English speaking Wiki browsers. Change it back if you disagree. I personally think the DMA article and any others should not contain such "speculative" information, Audits anyone? ;-) --Brynet-Inc 18:15, 16 September 2007 (CDT)