Talk:Paging: Difference between revisions

From OSDev.wiki
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jal in topic Really...
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(→‎Really...: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:


This is really x86-specific, shouldn't a Paging article be more or less generic, with specific pages made for paging on x86 and other architectures? --[[User:Pcmattman|pcmattman]] 03:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
This is really x86-specific, shouldn't a Paging article be more or less generic, with specific pages made for paging on x86 and other architectures? --[[User:Pcmattman|pcmattman]] 03:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

== Really... ==

"Paging is a memory scheme that breaks up memory in groups of pages that are constantly swapped between hard disk and computer" - That is utter bullshit. It should be rephrased. [[User:Jal|Jal]] 19:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:41, 29 November 2009

Memory management has the "Paging" section of this article. -Jhawthorn 21:57, 9 March 2007 (CST)

...and? Pull it to one article and link from the other? Merge the articles entirely? - Combuster 08:47, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
What about creating Paging and moving 'Virtual Memory' and 'Memory Protection' to it, along with creating a more in-depth article about paging in general? I think having Segmentation without Paging is a little uneven. Following that, this page could be deleted. --Alboin
Sounds OK to me. - Combuster 15:13, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
Done. --Alboin

This is really x86-specific, shouldn't a Paging article be more or less generic, with specific pages made for paging on x86 and other architectures? --pcmattman 03:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really...

"Paging is a memory scheme that breaks up memory in groups of pages that are constantly swapped between hard disk and computer" - That is utter bullshit. It should be rephrased. Jal 19:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]