Talk:NTFS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(→Field sizes: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What's so different about Japanese machines? Same hardware, right? |
What's so different about Japanese machines? Same hardware, right? |
||
--[[User:MessiahAndrw|MessiahAndrw]] 19:09, 11 January 2007 (CST) |
--[[User:MessiahAndrw|MessiahAndrw]] 19:09, 11 January 2007 (CST) |
||
== Field sizes == |
|||
I pause a bit when looking at the perpetuation of "unsigned short, 2 byte". It's itching me to change this shebang into "proper" types (i.e., uint16_t). However, I have positively <tt>no</tt> idea if "byte" should be signed or not...?!? {suppressing maniacal laughter} -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 01:55, 28 February 2012 (CST) |
Revision as of 07:55, 28 February 2012
"For the sake of performance and compatibility with some (especially Japanese) machines, NTFS allows sectors of other sizes." What's so different about Japanese machines? Same hardware, right? --MessiahAndrw 19:09, 11 January 2007 (CST)
Field sizes
I pause a bit when looking at the perpetuation of "unsigned short, 2 byte". It's itching me to change this shebang into "proper" types (i.e., uint16_t). However, I have positively no idea if "byte" should be signed or not...?!? {suppressing maniacal laughter} -- Solar 01:55, 28 February 2012 (CST)