Talk:Linker Scripts: Difference between revisions

From OSDev.wiki
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Solar in topic Link to online manual
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Solar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:


Take note that 2.9.1 predates 2.19 (or the currently up-to-date 2.21) by several years. The periods are significant in version numbering. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 12:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Take note that 2.9.1 predates 2.19 (or the currently up-to-date 2.21) by several years. The periods are significant in version numbering. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 12:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

== In progress ==

I just stumbled on this article and figured I could add a few things to improve it. I've done some editing to improve the encyclopedic tone and readability of the article. What needs to be added to make this a finished article on the subject? If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to do some work improving the article. --[[User:Ajxs|Ajxs]] 06:56, 26 December 2019 (CST)

Latest revision as of 12:56, 26 December 2019

Naming

Should the page say GNU ld, instead of simply "ld" since the linker script format is most likely GNU ld specific? - Sigjuice 21:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not really, as ld de facto refers to the GNU linker (and afaik no other linker is called ld). I decided to put it in anyway because it can do no harm and the word ld alone is hardly noticeable as a hyperlink - Combuster 18:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The name "ld" happens to be quite generic and predates the GNU movement (Part 2, page 20, Unix Programmer's Manual November 3, 1971). Also, most Unix-like systems have their own native linker, usually called ld. Here are four different versions of ld; AIX, Mac OS X, Solaris and HP-UX. - Sigjuice 08:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Link to online manual

Take note that 2.9.1 predates 2.19 (or the currently up-to-date 2.21) by several years. The periods are significant in version numbering. -- Solar 12:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

In progress

I just stumbled on this article and figured I could add a few things to improve it. I've done some editing to improve the encyclopedic tone and readability of the article. What needs to be added to make this a finished article on the subject? If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to do some work improving the article. --Ajxs 06:56, 26 December 2019 (CST)