Talk:James Molloy's Tutorial Known Bugs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "Problem: Heap Code "It is probably best that you write your own heap implementation." What's the purpose of this suggestion if it's so vague? Is Molloy's implementation buggy?" |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Problem: Heap Code |
== Problem: Heap Code == |
||
"It is probably best that you write your own heap implementation." |
|||
Maybe we should advise people more, to not use JamesM at all? --[[User:Makerimages|Makerimages]] 13:21, 19 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
What's the purpose of this suggestion if it's so vague? |
|||
Is Molloy's implementation buggy? |
|||
"It is probably best that you write your own heap implementation." What's the purpose of this suggestion if it's so vague? Is Molloy's implementation buggy? --[[User:Espanish|Espanish]] 05:58, 6 December 2014 (CST) |
|||
:I admit that I didn't read that code too closely. My impression at a glance was that I did not like the code, and didn't want to look for mistakes in it. You also forgot to sign your message by typing “<tt>--</tt><tt>~~</tt><tt>~~</tt>”. --[[User:Sortie|Sortie]] 11:56, 6 December 2014 (CST) |
|||
== Nobody noticed that the text for "Problem: __attribute__((packed))" is wrong? == |
|||
The text describes __attribute__((packed)) as the was C/C++ handles structs, packed does _not_ align/pad entries in the struct. |
|||
--[[User:Vtlmks|Vtlmks]] 00:39, 21 November 2017 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:39, 21 November 2017
Problem: Heap Code
Maybe we should advise people more, to not use JamesM at all? --Makerimages 13:21, 19 August 2015 (CDT)
"It is probably best that you write your own heap implementation." What's the purpose of this suggestion if it's so vague? Is Molloy's implementation buggy? --Espanish 05:58, 6 December 2014 (CST)
- I admit that I didn't read that code too closely. My impression at a glance was that I did not like the code, and didn't want to look for mistakes in it. You also forgot to sign your message by typing “--~~~~”. --Sortie 11:56, 6 December 2014 (CST)
Nobody noticed that the text for "Problem: __attribute__((packed))" is wrong?
The text describes __attribute__((packed)) as the was C/C++ handles structs, packed does _not_ align/pad entries in the struct. --Vtlmks 00:39, 21 November 2017 (CST)