Talk:Inline Assembly: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
asm("add %%eax,%%eax": "=a" (dummy)) : "0" (amount));// the "0" indicate that it's using the same register as the first parameter |
asm("add %%eax,%%eax": "=a" (dummy)) : "0" (amount));// the "0" indicate that it's using the same register as the first parameter |
||
</source> |
</source> |
||
--[[User:Dormito|Dormito]] 04:21, 13 February 2014 (CST)dormito |
|||
--dormito |
|||
[[User:Bewing|Bewing]] 00:20, 28 February 2007 (CST) |
[[User:Bewing|Bewing]] 00:20, 28 February 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 10:21, 13 February 2014
The following text came from the OSFAQ on AT&T vs Intel syntax differences -- but it seems to me that it belongs here, instead:
You can switch to intel syntax mode in the inline assembler with a pseudo op, and switch back at the end of the block. -- MirAbile
Page with the contents on it: http://www.osdev.org/osfaq2/index.php/GasIntelHowtoMirror -- DasCandy
Under "Input Operands" I dont think the example code:
asm("mov %%eax,%%ebx": : "a" (amount));//useless but it gets the idea
matches the text, namely I think it should be :
int dummy;
asm("add %%eax,%%eax": "=a" (dummy)) : "0" (amount));// the "0" indicate that it's using the same register as the first parameter
--Dormito 04:21, 13 February 2014 (CST)dormito
Bewing 00:20, 28 February 2007 (CST)