Talk:ISRs PIC And Multitasking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== IRQs in C == |
== IRQs in C == |
||
Why make this overly complicated hack when using assembly remains both shorter and simpler? |
Why make this overly complicated hack when using assembly remains both shorter and simpler? |
||
In my opinion, this is easier to begin with. It was very useful for me and allowed me to develop faster. But yes, it should be substituted by assembler interrupt handlers, mainly for efficiency so that not so many function calls are made (ISR->dispatcher->handler). [[User:Unsigned|Unsigned]] 03:53, 9 May 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 08:53, 9 May 2015
IRQs in C
Why make this overly complicated hack when using assembly remains both shorter and simpler?
In my opinion, this is easier to begin with. It was very useful for me and allowed me to develop faster. But yes, it should be substituted by assembler interrupt handlers, mainly for efficiency so that not so many function calls are made (ISR->dispatcher->handler). Unsigned 03:53, 9 May 2015 (CDT)