Talk:Getting to Ring 3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oh, and also the way this just gives a lot of links to relevant wiki pages doesn't seem to make it much of a tutorial. I always thought a tutorial was suppose to hold your hand through the whole thing(giving near complete code references) --[[User:Earlz|Earlz]] 04:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Isn't that external link to Germsoft a near exact rip of JamesM's tutorial? --[[User:Earlz|Earlz]] 04:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC) |
Isn't that external link to Germsoft a near exact rip of JamesM's tutorial? --[[User:Earlz|Earlz]] 04:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:54, 14 October 2009
Oh, and also the way this just gives a lot of links to relevant wiki pages doesn't seem to make it much of a tutorial. I always thought a tutorial was suppose to hold your hand through the whole thing(giving near complete code references) --Earlz 04:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Isn't that external link to Germsoft a near exact rip of JamesM's tutorial? --Earlz 04:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Good start, but needs more detail. Explain the what and why, and / or put in references to the relevant chapters in the Intel Manuals, so that a reader can understand *what* is necessary, and *why* it should be done this way. In the end, a tutorial should resemble a textbook chapter, not a forum posting.
But as I said, a good start. Do not let me discourage you. -- Solar 08:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)