Talk:Beginner Mistakes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Re: Pages for Review tag |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: '''Can you please''' tell me what FAQ format is? I don't really know what you mean by that. I see your point about formating and such, but I'll wait to attempt to fix it though until I see what this FAQ formatting things about. Thanks. --Alboin |
:: '''Can you please''' tell me what FAQ format is? I don't really know what you mean by that. I see your point about formating and such, but I'll wait to attempt to fix it though until I see what this FAQ formatting things about. Thanks. --Alboin |
||
:::We seem to have taken a different style of naming sections on the new articles. Example: On the OSFAQ we'd see something like "I have to write an OS for my studies, deadline is in three months..." and on this new wiki we'd likely have something like "Deadlines" or "Time Constraints". -[[User:Jhawthorn|Jhawthorn]] 18:21, 6 April 2007 (CDT) |
:::We seem to have taken a different style of naming sections on the new articles. Example: On the OSFAQ we'd see something like "I have to write an OS for my studies, deadline is in three months..." and on this new wiki we'd likely have something like "Deadlines" or "Time Constraints". -[[User:Jhawthorn|Jhawthorn]] 18:21, 6 April 2007 (CDT) |
||
ATM, we should find a way to make it reachable from the rest of the wiki. This includes a category (which one is a difficult question), and some direct links from other articles. Once that's done the PFR tag can be removed - [[User:Combuster|Combuster]] 16:49, 10 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:49, 10 April 2007
- ToDo: Extend this by misconceptions encountered around the web and in the forum.
Do you think this page is ready for removal out of "Pages for Review"? Or is there anything else that needs to be added that has come up recently on the forum? --Alboin
- It is NOT at all ready. It still references pages by their old name (ex. "using some language other than C"), is still in FAQ format, isn't formated correctly, links missing, section headers too long, uncategorized... -Jhawthorn 00:10, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
- Can you please tell me what FAQ format is? I don't really know what you mean by that. I see your point about formating and such, but I'll wait to attempt to fix it though until I see what this FAQ formatting things about. Thanks. --Alboin
- We seem to have taken a different style of naming sections on the new articles. Example: On the OSFAQ we'd see something like "I have to write an OS for my studies, deadline is in three months..." and on this new wiki we'd likely have something like "Deadlines" or "Time Constraints". -Jhawthorn 18:21, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
- Can you please tell me what FAQ format is? I don't really know what you mean by that. I see your point about formating and such, but I'll wait to attempt to fix it though until I see what this FAQ formatting things about. Thanks. --Alboin
ATM, we should find a way to make it reachable from the rest of the wiki. This includes a category (which one is a difficult question), and some direct links from other articles. Once that's done the PFR tag can be removed - Combuster 16:49, 10 April 2007 (CDT)