Anonymous user
C Library: Difference between revisions
Rewrite and improve section on MyOS libc
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
(added a little MUSL info) |
(Rewrite and improve section on MyOS libc) |
||
Line 1:
The C standard library provides string manipulation (string.h), basic I/O (stdio.h), memory allocation (stdlib.h), and other basic functionality to [[C]] programs. The interface is described in the C standard, with further additions described in [[POSIX]] as well as vendor extensions. On Unix platforms, the library is named <tt>libc</tt> and is linked automatically into every executable.
You need a C standard library implementation with the necessary features to run C programs on your operating system. [[C++]] programs can usually use the C standard library as well and the [[C++]] implementation is normally built on top of libc. It is possible to use the C standard interface in a kernel if the library implementation supports this.
== Freestanding and Hosted ==
There are two flavors of the C compilation environment: Hosted, where the standard library is available; and freestanding, where only a few headers are usable that contains only defines and types. The hosted environment is meant for user-space programming while freestanding is meant for kernel programming. The hosted environment is hosted, but you can switch to the freestanding by passing <tt>-ffreestanding</tt> to your compiler.
The <tt>__STDC_HOSTED__</tt> macro expands to <tt>1</tt> on hosted implementations, or <tt>0</tt> on freestanding ones. The freestanding headers are: <tt><float.h></tt>, <tt><iso646.h></tt>, <tt><limits.h></tt>, <tt><stdalign.h></tt>, <tt><stdarg.h></tt>, <tt><stdbool.h></tt>, <tt><stddef.h></tt>, <tt><stdint.h></tt>, and <tt><stdnoreturn.h></tt>. You should be familiar with these headers as they contain useful declarations you shouldn't do yourself. GCC also comes with additional freestanding headers for [[CPUID]], [[SSE]] and such.▼
== Implementations ==▼
There are several open-source C library packages
▲The <tt>__STDC_HOSTED__</tt> macro expands to <tt>1</tt> on hosted implementations, or <tt>0</tt> on freestanding ones. The freestanding headers are: <tt><float.h></tt>, <tt><iso646.h></tt>, <tt><limits.h></tt>, <tt><stdalign.h></tt>, <tt><stdarg.h></tt>, <tt><stdbool.h></tt>, <tt><stddef.h></tt>, <tt><stdint.h></tt>, and <tt><stdnoreturn.h></tt>.
There is a comparison table of some of these at: [http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html]▼
==
{{Main|Creating a C Library}}
The best option, in terms of code quality and integration with your operating system, is to write your own C library. You can aim for making a clean and high-quality implementation that follows standards well. It will integrate cleanly with your kernel as no portability layer is needed. You can be secure and robust. You can surpass the limits of what you can do with existing implementations. You can add vendor-extensions that replace bad interfaces and do things better. You can break a lot of code because you followed the standards and applications didn't, then fix the applications as well. It can be better than the competition if you make that your goal.
This is the idealist path and most in the osdev spirit. It has a lot of advantages, but has the steep price of requiring a lot of effort. This may very well be worth it if your goal is to make a ''good'' operating system, not just ''a'' operating system. You don't have to be a libc expert when starting out, but you'll be one when you're done. You might just realize much of the competition out there isn't very good.
▲==Implementations==
Creating your own minimal C library is relatively easy. Providing all the primitives needed by real program is a much larger task, but straightforward as you can attempt to cross-compile the software and implement all the missing features causing compilation errors.
▲There are several open-source C library packages avaialble, and using one may be a viable solution for you. All of them will require some degree of modification to suit your needs. You may instead wish to roll your own, but keep in mind that a good C library implementation often requires 10 years or more to create.
=== Newlib ===▼
▲There is a comparison table of some of these at: [http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html]
▲===Newlib===
* The license is unrestricted (not GPL or LGPL), but each file likely has a different copyright notice.
* Requires threading, so is more appropriate for a runtime library
* About 400 functions supported
* [http://sourceware.org/newlib/ newlib website]
=== GlibC ===
* Should be absolutely complete▼
* GPL license
▲* Should be absolutely complete (even has all the bloat)
* [http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ glibc website]
===
* No kernel portability layer, uses the Linux system calls directly.
* Support for about 1200 functions
* Many system calls needs to be implemented as it assumes you are a full Linux
* [http://www.etalabs.net/musl/ musl website]▼
=== PDCLib ===
* Under active development, and not at full working release 1.0 yet
▲* Creative Commons Zero license (basically public domain)
* Good for linking into kernels
* Support for about 120 functions, currently
Line 54 ⟶ 52:
* [http://pdclib.e43.eu/ PDCLib website]
===
* LGPL license
* [http://www.uclibc.org/ uclibc website]
===
▲* MIT or BSD licenses on all sourcecode (permissive)
▲* a full set of math and printf functions
▲* [http://www.etalabs.net/musl/ musl website]
* GPL license
* [http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ dietlibc website]
===
*
▲* no support for locales
▲* no libthread_db or libm implementation
▲* its own smallish implementation of pthreads based on Linux futexes
▲* support for x86, ARM and ARM thumb CPU instruction sets and kernel interfaces
* [https://github.com/android/platform_bionic/tree/master/libc bionic website]
== Standards ==
Especially if you want to roll your own C lib, you may want to buy the ISO/IEC 9899 specification to work from.
Line 96 ⟶ 76:
following sites and search for document "ISO/IEC 9899".
|