Licensing: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 279: Line 279:
projects.)
projects.)


*But*, if many other people contributed to your project, you might be in deep
'''But''', if many other people contributed to your project, you might be in
trouble, as - ''legally speaking'', and probably morally speaking too - you
deep trouble, as - ''legally speaking'', and probably morally speaking too -
might no longer be the sole copyright holder, and a license can only changed
you might no longer be the sole copyright holder, and a license can only
''if all copyright holders agree''.
changed ''if all copyright holders agree''.


Let me repeat this: If you want to change the license of your project
Let me repeat this: If you want to change the license of your project
* from GPL to anything else,
* from GPL to anything else;
* from LGPL to anything else but GPL,
* from LGPL to anything else but GPL;
* from BSD to anything else,
* from BSD to anything else;
* from some X to some Y I haven't though about,
* from some X to some Y I haven't though about;


''you might not be allowed to do so even when it's your own project.''
''you might not be allowed to do so even when it's your own project''.


That is one reason why the Free Software Foundation encourages people to
That is one reason why the Free Software Foundation encourages people to
transfer the ''copyright'' of sources to the FSF, ''in writing'', as only
transfer the ''copyright'' of sources to the FSF, ''in writing'', as only this
this enables the FSF to change the licensing of those sources in ways not
enables the FSF to change the licensing of those sources in ways not explicitly
explicitly covered in the (L)GPL itself.
covered in the (L)GPL itself.