Languages: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Content deleted Content added
Strip some embryo propaganda and put back the warnings where they belong. |
Fixed a typo |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* If XYZ fits the other points and is an interpreted language, can you invoke code coming from raw data bytes with XYZ, i.e. jump at a specific address and continue execution there (this will be mandatory for loading and running programs)? |
* If XYZ fits the other points and is an interpreted language, can you invoke code coming from raw data bytes with XYZ, i.e. jump at a specific address and continue execution there (this will be mandatory for loading and running programs)? |
||
If any of those question turns out to "whoops, no, I cannot do that with language XYZ", then chances are that XYZ will be of no help for OS development. This particular problem has often been circumvented by modifying the language and |
If any of those question turns out to "whoops, no, I cannot do that with language XYZ", then chances are that XYZ will be of no help for OS development. This particular problem has often been circumvented by modifying the language and writing new compilers. |
||
== Can't I write a compiler for XYZ? == |
== Can't I write a compiler for XYZ? == |
||