Andy Microbaum: Difference between revisions

From OSDev.wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Content deleted Content added
Not true of me anymore
 
Line 23: Line 23:
* Mach (the fundament of Hurd)
* Mach (the fundament of Hurd)
* [[User:PeterX|PeterX]] I'm strongly against a monolithic kernel, so I fall more or less under the microkernel category
* [[User:PeterX|PeterX]] I'm strongly against a monolithic kernel, so I fall more or less under the microkernel category
* [[User:Nexos|Nexos]] I've always had a draw to microkernel, since Linux and Windows are insecure


[[Category:Developer Archetype]]
[[Category:Developer Archetype]]

Latest revision as of 22:01, 19 February 2021

Andy abhors monolithic kernels like Linux, Windows or BSD. He rather writes a carefully designed little kernel that does some basic stuff and leaves the rest for user space.

Pro's & Con's

Pro:

  • easier to maintain

Con:

  • more overhead
  • harder to program

Going further than Andy Microbaum

Consider other kernel designs: Layered, modular or even smaller (nanokernel, exokernel)

Andy Microbaum's bookshelf

Research papers on microkernels

Andy Microbaum's opponents position

Monolithic kernel (= all in one big kernel) Mono Lizzy

See also the famous Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate

People and OSes related to Andy Microbaum

  • Amoeba [1] (a libre distributed OS)
  • Mach (the fundament of Hurd)
  • PeterX I'm strongly against a monolithic kernel, so I fall more or less under the microkernel category