Andy Microbaum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Content deleted Content added
This is me... |
→Andy Microbaum's opponents position: +Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Andy Microbaum's opponents position == |
== Andy Microbaum's opponents position == |
||
Monolithic kernel (= all in one big kernel) |
Monolithic kernel (= all in one big kernel) |
||
See also the famous [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanenbaum%E2%80%93Torvalds_debate Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate] |
|||
== People and OSes related to Andy Microbaum == |
== People and OSes related to Andy Microbaum == |
Revision as of 18:50, 22 June 2020
Andy abhors monolithic kernels like Linux, Windows or BSD. He rather writes a carefully designed little kernel that does some basic stuff and leaves the rest for user space.
Pro's & Con's
Pro:
- easier to maintain
Con:
- more overhead
- harder to program
Going further than Andy Microbaum
Consider other kernel designs: Layered, modular or even smaller (nanokernel, exokernel)
Andy Microbaum's bookshelf
Research papers on microkernels
Andy Microbaum's opponents position
Monolithic kernel (= all in one big kernel)
See also the famous Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate