User talk:Combuster/Frankenstein's MSVC: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Creature in topic A couple of notes
(Added notes.) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Creature|Creature]] 09:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
[[User:Creature|Creature]] 09:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Optimizing Compiler? == |
|||
I don't like this article as it indirectly suggests that all other compilers are *not* optimizing. Additionally, "Microsoft C/C++ Optimizing Compiler" is *not* the name of the compiler, though I forgot what the official name is. "Microsoft C Compiler", "Visual Studio", "Visual C Compiler"? Anyways, probably a good idea to rename this article. --[[User:Sortie|Sortie]] 13:14, 4 November 2013 (CST) |
|||
:Oh god. I deleted this article once and it didn't take! --[[User:Sortie|Sortie]] 14:45, 1 December 2014 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:45, 1 December 2014
A couple of notes
- In "Building an OS image", the file Test.cpp AFAIK does an invalid write to video memory; the color attribute byte used in video memory (of which each cell is a word) is overwritten with the next character of the word. You may want to fix that to set a standard color.
- I think it may be handy if you also posted the versions of Wine and Visual C++ you used with this article. AFAIK not all versions of Wine work with each version of the VC++ compiler equally well.
Optimizing Compiler?
I don't like this article as it indirectly suggests that all other compilers are *not* optimizing. Additionally, "Microsoft C/C++ Optimizing Compiler" is *not* the name of the compiler, though I forgot what the official name is. "Microsoft C Compiler", "Visual Studio", "Visual C Compiler"? Anyways, probably a good idea to rename this article. --Sortie 13:14, 4 November 2013 (CST)
- Oh god. I deleted this article once and it didn't take! --Sortie 14:45, 1 December 2014 (CST)