Talk:ARM Overview: Difference between revisions

 

So if you can help then by all means edit it.

 

:RISC is the better ''theory''. But Intel has burned unbelievable amounts of money in R&D and fab technology, so they still have the edge performance-wise. Many of the things originally introduced for and by RISC have been hammered into submission and added to the x86/x64 chips. As such, I'd just drop the subject. You don't have to make a case, or even a detailed comparison of technologies. Just point out how ARM is different, and keep it at that. IMHO. -- [[User:Solar|Solar]] 05:09, 20 March 2012 (CDT)