Non Maskable Interrupt: Difference between revisions

Non Maskable Interrupt (view source)

37 bytes removed , 13 years ago

No, you wouldn't be in trouble. Clarifications; explanation wasn't really correct.

[unchecked revision]

Anonymous user

Revision as of 02:26, 19 April 2011 (view source) osdev>Love4boobies m (Source highlighting, removed redundant comments) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:32, 19 April 2011 (view source) osdev>Love4boobies (No, you wouldn't be in trouble. Clarifications; explanation wasn't really correct.) Newer edit →
Line 1: The NMI ("Non Maskable Interrupt") is a hardware-driven interrupt much like the PIC interrupts, but the NMI goes either directly to the CPU, ~~not~~or via another controller (e.g., the ~~PIC~~ISP)---in ~~controller~~which case you can mask them. ~~Luckily, you '''can''' have control over the NMI -- otherwise you would be in deep trouble.~~ ==About==