Continuation Systems: Difference between revisions
added category
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
No edit summary |
(added category) |
||
Line 21:
An interesting side question: Can events be used to implement standard synchronization objects, assuming that the kernel makes events work in a parallel-safe manner? It can easily be shown that events will sufficiently serve to implement barrier variables, but what about semaphores?
[[Category:Processes and Threads]]
| |||