Anonymous user
Code Management: Difference between revisions
m
Misspelling of Windows Millennium
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
m (→Version Control Systems: Add link to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revision_control) |
m (Misspelling of Windows Millennium) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 19:
Although this is usually less important than the previous concern, you need to keep the way different versions are numbered consistent. Some number versions sequentially (e.g. ''0.1'', then ''0.2'', then ''0.3''...) while others increment the minor version (e.g. the ''2'' in ''1.2'') number sequentially for small updates and only increment the major version number (the first number in the version) only when they add a major improvement to the projects. Some also add revision and build numbers, which are incremented by some random number every time a change is made to a file, which gives weird version numbers such as ''2.2.11127.56150'', which are hard to remember.
Additionally, you may give each release a special name. Projects that use that strategy include Mac OS X (e.g. Leopard, Lion, Mountain Lion...), Android (e.g. Gingerbread, Jelly Bean, Ice Cream Sandwich...), Windows (e.g.
[http://semver.org/ "Semantic Versioning"] is an attempt to unify versioning schemes. You probably already use a scheme that is close to this one.
Line 59:
=== Version Control Systems ===
A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
But the main point in using a VCS is that it enables two (or more) persons to work on the same codebase at once without interfering with each other. A VCS also allows you to place your source code on the Internet and have your whole team co-operate using a single server. Many source code hosting websites (such as Google Code
[[Category:Organization]]
|